![Text Box: PLO/Fatah means to resume Hajj Amin al Husseini’s jihad and see through the German Nazi Final Solution by annihilating the Jews in Israel.
“From the outset... the Fatah’s reputation depended largely upon the success of its Moslem traditionalist approach of jihad against Israel.” [ Sachar, H. 1982. A history of Israel: From the rise of Zionism to our time. New York: Knopf. (pp.619, 698) ]
Many people believe that the PLO Covenant or Charter has been revoked so that it no longer calls for the destruction of Israel. This, however, was a show of hands, a theater for TV, rather than an actual rewriting of the Charter, which remains as before.
But even if you believe that the Charter really was revoked, it hardly matters. The revocation of the Charter would be the equivalent of a formal aman, or a truce pact with infidels. But in Muslim tradition,
“the imam may repudiate the pact made if that is conducive to the interests of Islam. ...This is based on the precedent of the Prophet [Muhammad], who broke the agreement made between him and the Meccans” [ Aghnides, N. P. 1916. "Classification of Persons," in Mohammedan Theories of Finance, pp. 354-59. New York: Cambridge University Press. Reproduced in Bostom (2005:301-04) ]
In theory one is supposed to notify the enemy that one is breaking the agreement, but, as explained in Point 3, from the Muslim point of view Jews trying to create their own homeland in what was previously Muslim-ruled land turns them into the equivalent of renegades, which is to say that they must all be killed unless they convert to Islam, and no consideration whatever will be shown to them. So any appearance of a truce from the PLO/Fatah may be assumed to be a ruse to place PLO/Fatah in a better position to kill Jews.
If the supposed revocation of the PLO Charter is indeed a ruse, we should expect PLO/Fatah to be teaching Palestinians that they must destroy Israel. This is indeed the case. For example, consider the school textbooks that PLO/Fatah creates for Palestinian children. Palestinian Media Wath, an organization that monitors what Palestinian Arabs are told by their PLO/Fatah (Palestinian Authority) government, explains that,
“At the end of 2006, the Palestinian Authority (PA) Ministry of Higher Education introduced new 12th grade schoolbooks, written by the Center for Developing the Palestinian Curricula. The center is comprised of Palestinian educators appointed by the Fatah governments of Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, and directed by Dr. Naim Abu Al-Humos, former PA Minister of Higher Education, appointed in 2002. The center is backed by foreign funding, with special thanks to Belgium noted in the
new schoolbooks.” [ From Nationalist Battle
To Religious Conflict: New 12th Grade Palestinian schoolbooks present a world without Israel; February 2007; Palestinian Media Watch; Written by Itamar Marcus & Barbara Crook ]
So what do Palestinian children learn in their PLO/Fatah textbooks? PMW explains:
“The following description of Israel’s founding represents the dominant dogma about Israel in Palestinian schoolbooks:
Palestine’s war ended with a catastrophe that is unprecedented in history, when the Zionist gangs stole Palestine and expelled its people from their cities, their villages, their lands and their houses, and established the State of Israel. [Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Criticism, grade 12, p. 104 ]
Defining Israel’s founding as a ‘catastrophe unprecedented in history,’ ‘a theft perpetrated by ‘Zionist gangs,’ together with numerous other hateful descriptions of Israel as ‘colonial imperialist’ and ‘racist’, compounded by the presentation of the conflict as a religious war, leaves no latitude for students to have positive or even neutral attitudes towards Israel. This negative imagery and religious packaging are compounded by hateful presentations of Israeli policy. The young students are imbued with a Palestinian identity as ‘victims’ just by virtue of Israel’s existence. The well-meaning student is left with no logical justification or religious option to accept Israel as a neighbor or to seek coexistence. Given the total rejection of Israel’s right to exist, on nationalistic and religious grounds, Palestinian terror against Israel since Israel’s founding in 1948 is defined as: ‘resistance... acts of most glorious heroism.’ [Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Commentary, grade 12 p 105] ”
In fact, the PLO/Fatah textbooks teach jihad.
“PA educators teach that fighting Israel is not merely a territorial conflict, but also a religious battle for Islam. The schoolbooks define the conflict with Israel as ‘Ribat for Allah’ -- ‘one of the actions related to Jihad for Allah, and it means: Being found in areas where there is a struggle between Muslims and their enemies’. Israel is thus stigmatized as existing on Islam’s land, and fighting Israel is transformed from an Arab nationalistic goal into an uncompromising battle for God. Moreover, the youth are taught that their specific conflict with Israel -- for ‘Palestine’ -- is ‘one of the greatest of the Ribat, and they [Palestinians] are worthy of a great reward from Allah’. [Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Commentary, grade 12 pp. 86-87].”
PMW concludes:
“Instead of seizing the opportunity to educate future generations to live with Israel in peace, the PA schoolbooks glorify terror and teach their children to hate Israel, vilify Israel’s existence and define the battle with Israel as an uncompromising religious war. Instead of working to minimize the current hate, the new PA curriculum is ingraining it into the next generation’s consciousness, and packaging the war against Israel as existential, mandatory and religious. The new PA schoolbooks are guaranteeing that the next generation will grow up seeing Israel as an illegitimate enemy to be hated, fought, and destroyed, rather than as a neighbor to negotiate with and to ultimately live beside in peace.”
Given that the supposed revocation of the PLO Covenant or Charter is a complete fraud, we need to take its contents seriously.
Article 9 of the PLO Charter, composed in 1968, states that “armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.” This can also be rendered: “Killing people is the only way to liberate Palestine.” Killing which people? Article 15 of the PLO Charter states that it is “a national duty to repulse the Zionist imperialist invasion from the great Arab homeland and to purge the Zionist presence from Palestine,” and Article 22 declares that “the liberation of Palestine will liquidate the Zionist and imperialist presence.” In other words, the PLO will liberate Palestine by purging and liquidating -- exterminating -- “Zionists” (Jews). [Note: The PLO Charter articles were translated by: The Associated Press, December 15, 1998, Tuesday, AM cycle, International News, 1070 words, Clinton meets with Netanyahu, Arafat, appeals for progress, By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent, EREZ CROSSING, Gaza Strip.]
The evidence so far is consistent with a PLO/Fatah conception of the Oslo Process as a Trojan Horse. That is to say, PLO/Fatah pretends that it will be satisfied with a piece of territory -- this is the 'gift' equivalent to the Trojan Horse: the promise of peace -- when in fact it seeks a better position from which to kill Jews. One of the PLO's highest officials once explained it like that, even using the expression "Trojan Horse."
“…Faisal Husseini, the top PLO official in Jerusalem…[was] quoted as likening the Oslo accords to a ‘Trojan horse.’ …the weekly Al-Arabi quotes Husseini as calling the Oslo accords ‘just a temporary procedure, or just a step towards something bigger…the liberation of all historical Palestine from the (Jordan) river to the (Mediterranean) sea, even if this means that the conflict will last for another thousand years or for many generations.’” [ The Baltimore Sun, July 11, 2001 Wednesday, FINAL EDITION, Pg. 1A, 1574 words, Israelis taking darker view of Palestinian intentions; Many see existence of Jewish state at risk, Mark Matthews ]
If statements by Arafat were needed, they have been produced:
“Shortly after signing the Declaration of Principles and the famous handshake between [PLO leader Yasser] Arafat and [Israeli prime minister] Yitzhak Rabin on the White House lawn, Arafat was declaring to his Palestinian constituency over Jordanian television that Oslo was to be understood in terms of the [PLO’s] Palestine National Council’s 1974 decision. This was a reference to the so-called Plan of Phases, according to which the Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO] would acquire whatever territory it could by negotiations, then use that land as a base for pursuing its ultimate goal of Israel’s annihilation.” [ Levin, K. 2005. The Oslo syndrome: Delusions of a people under siege. Hanover, NH: Smith and Kraus. (p.ix) ]
Mahmoud Abbas, the current PLO/Fatah leader, is one of the main influences behind the Trojan Horse strategy that is the Plan of Phases. This was shown in an article in the London-based Arabic daily Al Sharq Al-Awsat, where the author Saleh Qallab explains to his Arab audience what PLO/Fatah chief Mahmoud Abbas’s ideology is. And it is this: to talk ‘peace’ in order to soften, divide, and confuse the Israelis, the better to prepare them for slaughter.
MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) translated the article and commented as follows:
...Saleh Qallab discusses the importance of the polarization of Israeli society... The author’s analysis focuses on the political thought of PLO Executive Committee Secretary General, Mahmoud Abbas, aka “Abu Mazen,” who was the first to claim that the fragmentation of Israeli society is relevant to the Arab strategy in the peace process.
...writes Qallab: “Israel as a mosaic of different races and groups... divided, flooded with internal feuds, and composed of people who have nothing to do with one another.”
“Most Arabs failed to notice this phenomenon, with the exception of the PLO Abu Mazen, who [recently] wrote a 73 page study of the racial and religious polarization in Israel... Abu Mazen was the first to focus on the mosaic-nature of the Israeli society and one of his studies on this topic earned him a Ph.D. from a Soviet university.”
Qallab recalls that Abu Mazen was the first to attribute importance to the fragmentation of Israeli society - 20 years ago: “Abu Mazen lectured at length on this issue in Tehran to a group of Palestinian and Arab journalists, accompanying Palestinian President Arafat, when he went to congratulate Khomeini for the triumph of the Iranian revolution. It was in February 1979, a week after Khomeini's return from exile in France.”
...Qallab states that Abu Mazen is a pioneer of the realistic school, which, in his opinion, included former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, “who... told some PLO leaders, including Yasser Arafat, Abu Iyad, and Khaled Al-Hassan, that it was necessary to bring the Israelis down from their tanks to the ground and cause them a sense of security and peace, to allow their social maladies to appear and to prevent their unification in the face of a[n external] danger.” [ “Arab Peace Strategy and the Fragmentation of Israeli Society”; MEMRI; July 21, 1999; No.40.]
Mahmoud Abbas's strategy has worked beautifully. He is portrayed everywhere as a moderate and 'partner for peace.'](TAG7_files/image351.png)
|
PLO/Fattah's objective is a genocide of the Jewish people |
|
Above, Fatah chief
|
|
Fatah troops give Nazi salute. |
|
The Iliad famously tells the story of a large wooden horse, hollow inside and secretly filled with soldiers. The ancient Greeks offered the Trojans this horse as a supposed gift, in recognition of their defeat, after attempting to storm the city of Troy for 10 years. The gullible Trojans took this "gift" inside their city walls. At night, the soldiers inside the horse crept out, opened the gates to the Greek army outside, and murdered every man, woman, and child in Troy, burning the city to the ground. |
|
Abbas Plan Phases is working |
|
|
|
|